Dr. Andy

Reflections on medicine and biology among other things

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Grand Rounds 2:22

Hello and welcome to Grand Rounds 2:22. I decided to highlight 10 posts that I found most outstanding among all those submitted. This was hard as there were many excellent posts. The top 10 are not listed in any particular order.

And take heart if you, like me, suffer from a subclinical case of seasonal affective disorder. Spring is definitely coming! (click on pictures to enlarge)

Featured Articles

Kim at Emergiblog takes a look at what she has learned from blogging and reading other health/medicine related blogs. As she notes, one of the best things about something like Grand Rounds is seeing the world of medicine and health from others' eyes.

Redstatemoron (his title, not mine) comments on the costs, both financial and physical, of defensive medicine. I've always felt physicians were by nature defensive (something about the obsessive-compulsive traits needed to get into and through medical school) and that, more than fear of malpractice suits, drove overcautious practice. His examples, however, are persuasive.

Clinicalcasesandimagesconsiders the utility of medicine specific search engines. These "vertical" search engines cover less area than the more common horizontal ones (e.g. Google) but results are more likely to be relevant. I tried them using my own name and found Omnimedicalsearch worked well, weeding out non-medical references (but also all but one reference to my blog) whereas Kosmix was useless. YMMV.

Dr. Bob relates life lessons unintentionally imparted to him by a patient on a recent call weekend. Conclusion: Knives, hookers, and cocaine don't mix. Warning, the post itself is fine, but the linked photos are not pretty.

Mary, a nurse and child advocate at The Mote in the Light agonizes over the decision to remove a baby from her mother, not because of outright abuse, but because mom just couldn't provide the level of care needed given the child's medical problems. The decsion is the right one, but heartbreaking nonetheless.

Orac, in new digs at science blogs, gives a list of clues that you may be an "altie;" that is someone who is such a believer in alternative modalities of treatment that your fervor is almost religious. Very well done in sort of a highbrow Jeff Foxworthy kind of way.

Know what a transplant coordinator is? It's someone who goes and asks the family of dying people if they can have the organs (no it's not like in Monty Python's Life of Brian). Along with working with abused kids it's about the toughest job I can imagine. On call at all hours, a subject no one wants to talk about and other lives hanging in the balance. And most good candidates for donation, I think, are young and dying unexpectedly. Ouch. One of those jobs I'm grateful someone else does. Wonder what it's like? Then read this from a real life transplant coordinator at Donorcycle

Bob at Insureblog posts about how big pharma is using the new Medicare drug benefit to discontinue programs which provide drugs free or at reduced costs to the poor. Good grief, Charlie Brown.

Dr. Erik Novak writing at Thismakesmesick.com which is dedicated to cleaning up the mess that is our malpractice system (Good luck! but I like the idea of approaching things from a variety of different angles) blogs about new found sense in the justice system: many bogus lawsuits are now being dismissed. Now if they would just sue the plaintiffs lawyers for malpractice we'd be on even footing (I am deadly serious about this).

Doctor Inspector Charles solves a case of unusual bruising in this literary post "the unusual case of Mr. Black". Anti-tobacco zealots should probably pass on this one, what with the furor about smoking in movies and all.

Clinical applications of basic science

In an elegantly illustrated and detailed post, Bora from Circadiana, a blog all about chronobiology, shows how lithium, commonly used to treat bipolar disorder, also affects circadian rhythyms. This suggests that the underlying cause of bipolar disorder (also known as manic-depression) may have to do with dysfunction of the body's own clock. Very interesting

Gloria posts at Biotech-weblog about a new instantaneous method of meauring fetal hypoxia. As Redstatemoron notes in his post featured above, the question of when to intervene with C-section for fetal distress is one of the most difficult in medicine. Hopefully this will help.

Blogmeister at Anxietyaddictionanddepressiontreatments notes a controversy brewing about the possibility of treating addiction with medicines. I'd comment than when one side is publishing papers in Nature Medicine and the other rebuttals in the New York Times I think I know who's going to be right in the end.

Reports from the front

Keith from Digital Doorway reflects on two patients rescued from difficult social situations by family and wonders if he'd be as willing to bring a troubled family member into his own home.

TheBlogThatAteManhattan (which combines two of my favorite topics, medicine and food) posts about the problems that happend when the doctor is out sick, specifically what happened when she had to take time off to fight hepatitis C. No disasters, but a lot of things can fall throught the cracks.

Keagirl, a female urologist at Urostream tells of the gender discrimination she faces from male patients. I have heard tales of woe from men in OB/GYN but this turns things around. I also like this post from her relatively new blog.

Dr. John Crippen at NHS Blog Doctor comments on the reluctance of UK doctors to tell patients that they are dying, and the reluctance of patients to come out and ask. Stiff upper lip and all can't help, but this is a hard subject for doctors everywhere.

Neonataldoc comments on a patient with holoprosencephaly, a severe failure of brain development, who for some reason is put on a home monitor when (in at least Neonataldoc's opinon) death would be the best thing for everyone involved. Don't miss the first comment by a mother of a child with a degenerative condition who is nearing the end of his life about her struggle with the idea of a "do not resuscitate (DNR)" order.

Enoch Choi at Medmusings dreams about what a really good electronic health record could do. Take home message: we've come come far, but we've got even farther to go.

Healthyconcerns notes a recent case in Canada where a surgeon refused to operate on a smoker. Seems unfair, until you read that in the surgeon's judgement, the risks of wound infection or poor healing outweigh the benefit of the operation. I don't see how any system could require surgeons to operate on any patient who thought they needed it.

Commentary

Dr. Joel Furhman of DiseaseProof.com gives us the top 10 reasons to be skeptical of the recent trial showing no benefit of low-fat diets.

Medviews considers both this paper and the one showing no benefit in calcium supplementation for women, both products of the Women's Health Initiative. Woody Allen is mentioned.

Marcus at Fixin' healthcare has similar thoughts, using the analogy of blind men trying to describe the elephant: studies focus on this or that intervention when what is needed is a focus on doing many small things we already know are good for us.

I have a few thoughts about these studies as well.

Gloria at Straightfromthedoc notes the introduction of a centralized pharmacy history for patients. I've always marvelled how hard it is to figure out exactly what medicines a patient is on. I know there are privacy concerns, but something like this is sorely needed.

Tara Smith from Aetiology (I had to look it up too) blogs about why "Pox parties," designed to ensure infection with chicken pox are a bad idea now that we have an effective vaccine. I had no idea these still went on; the Simpson's rerun Sunday night featured a pox party and I thought it was dated. Good comments, too.

Sumer, a radiologist in Delhi, comments on a recent NEJM piece about outsourcing reading of radiological studies. Don't hold your breath Sumer, U.S. radiologists will fight tooth and nail to keep this from happening

Wanderingvisitor considers the question of whether medical events cluster around the full moon, as the nurses he's worked with believe. Count me a skeptic (other than animal bites, which may just reflect people being out in nature more when there's some light). I suspect a signficant publication bias in the studies he quotes. WV is a very new blogger, this being only his 5th post! Might be some kind of record.

Thecheerfuloncologist considers the recent JAMA study predicting elderly patients risk of death. He introduces us to an index that purports to measure mortality risk, or at least degree of burnout, in interns. Don't miss his links, one of which (the Camel ad) is priceless.

Tony Chen at Hospitalimpact summarizes a number of recent posts about hospital strategy. Not only is "hospital strategy" not an oxymoron, but some hospitals apparently have strategies other than maximizing overall annoyance

Kate Steadman at Healthpolicy examines donut hole (mmm donut holes) health plans. These offer 1st dollar coverage, then a "deductible" after a certain threshold, then at a higher dollar level coverage resumes. Good for the very well (routine doctors visits covered) but as she points out the deductible has to be larger to save money since some of the insured will never reach it.

Medicofone considers an alternative explanation for the drop in cancer deaths.

DB at the eponymous DBsmedicalrants considers what is and what isn't primary care. He concludes that the primary care of complex patients should be seen as a specialty in its own right.


Patient's Perspective

Diabetes mine, a recently diagnosed type I diabetes patient, attended a postgraduate conference on diabetes care. Her perspective is as a patient, not a provider, but she liked the free goodies just like everyone else

Difficultpatient shares her frustration with those who don't believe ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) exists because it does and her son is affected. I agree with her that it may be overdiagnosed (in my opinion teacher's who want compliant students are a prime driver) but there are some kids who are just out-of-control unless on stimulants.

Advice for Patients

Dust in the Wind has some advice for parents bringing their child to the ED which should apply to office visits with kids as well. My rule #1 is "listen to the nurses."

Dr. Emer at Paralleluniverse recommends staying away from McDonalds french fries, which contain 1/3 more trans fat than previously advertised. He does acknowledge that they taste good.


Occasional Notes

Doctor, nee Medical Madhouse Madman, complains about his difficulty in getting listed on Medlogs, which is a medical blog aggregator.

Grunt doc asks other ED docs to pledge not to offer expert opinion unless it is in concordance with accepted standards of care. I'm just guessing this has been a problem in the field.

Rita at MSSPNexusblog reflects that even health chare workers sometimes have bad hair days. Some of us just have them more frequently than others.

Insider at Pharmagossip takes a revealing glance at hiring practices of big pharma in this NOT SAFE FOR WORK post. You were warned.

Geeknurse gives some suggestions about communication in the medical blogosphere. Unfortunately he doesn't link to the bad example he cites. Oh well, not everyone can be in-the-know. I sympathize with the problem of anonymous flames.

And finally, if the above links aren't enough for you, here is another entire carnival dedicated to doctors only natural enemies, lawyers. The focus is on health care law.

Next week Grand Rounds is at Achancetocutisachancetocure.

PS My intention was to include everyone who submitted by the deadline; if I inadvertently left you out, I apologize.

25 Comments:

At 8:21 AM, Blogger coturnix said...

Love the organization as well as the commentary for each post. Great job! Thank you.

 
At 8:31 AM, Anonymous Medic-of-one said...

Crackin' toast Grommit! ... err, Great rounds!

 
At 8:34 AM, Blogger Barbados Butterfly said...

What a stupendous job!

 
At 9:36 AM, Anonymous TBTAM, MD said...

Thanks, Dr Andy! Great grand rounds, great commentary. That was a lot of work you did...

 
At 11:51 AM, Blogger neonataldoc said...

Nice work, and lots of it. Thank you.

 
At 3:30 PM, Blogger insider said...

Thank you......hope my "not suitable for work" post didn't lower the tone too much. ;-)

 
At 3:56 PM, Blogger keagirl said...

Wow! is all I can say. Thank you!

 
At 9:06 PM, Blogger Henry Stern, LUTCF said...

Terrific job, Andy!

I like the compromise you reached: part Dr John (Ford), part free-for-all. Excellent balance and, as another commenter notes, your own commentary adds a great "texture" to it.

Thanx for hosting!

 
At 9:24 PM, Blogger mary said...

Thanks for including my post, it's an honor for a newcomer like me. Great organization of such disparate topics, and the beautiful illustrations are just a wonderful plus.

 
At 2:06 AM, Blogger The Medicine Man said...

Great job Andrew. Thanks for filtering this week's excellent range of posts. I liked echo Henry Stern's comment about also providing the links for the other submissions as well (many of which I also read).

John

 
At 3:13 AM, Blogger PaedsRN said...

I highly recommend this format to future hosts, with the proviso that those short on time might care to just list the non-featured submissions with a link, rather than pad with the excellent descriptions you provided. Outstanding job!

 
At 10:16 AM, Anonymous AmyT said...

Excellent job, Dr. Andy. This must have taken you hours!

(btw, I'm a journalist as well as a patient)

 
At 2:05 PM, Blogger Dr. Charles said...

one of the best GR yet, thank you!

 
At 2:08 PM, Anonymous Richard said...

I think you meant Monty Python's 'Meaning of Life', not 'Life of Brian'. That's the one with the 'liver donors card' sketch.

 
At 4:44 PM, Blogger JohnG said...

Dr. Andy: You've got to learn to distinguish between those that are helpful and those who are parasitic. Health Care lawyers, like Estate Planning, Tax, and Real Estate lawyers can be quite helpful to a medical practice.

Plaintiffs' Trial Lawyers, on the other hand, can suck the life from a thriving practice faster than untreated sepsis in an immunology challenged patient.

As a tial lawyer who spent 35 years defending physicians (and other professionals) against professional negligence claims (and only defending them), I am dismayed at your broad stroke condemnation of my profession.

I agree there has been widespread abuse of the legal system whenever greed and a "deep pocket" defendant meet. Frankly, such circumstances just made me and every other member of my firm, and just about every insurance carrier I've worked with, all the more determined to defeat the claim being made. Or, at least, limit its success to actual negligence and a fair amount of damages.

I'm not asking for thanks or praise - I just did my job. I would appreciate, however, your caution in the future when you seek to castigate a group of individuals - like every group, some are good, some are not.

 
At 4:56 PM, Blogger Dr. Andy said...

Thanks for all the kind comments. I'll post later in the week about what hosting Grand Rounds was like; mostly it wasn't as bad as I'd feared

Richard you are right, I did mean "Meaning of Life"

John, sorry if I offended you. My comment about lawyers being MD's natural enemies was meant to be lighthearted. My brother is a lawyer as are several of my friends.

My comment about suing lawyers who bring frivilous lawsuits was absolutely serious. If the small subset of lawyers who bring these suits were subject to litigation for malpractice and had to face the roullette wheel doctors face, I think there would be a lot fewer. The Pennsylvania Medical Association has apparently wanted to bring such suits but been unable to find a single lawyer willing to take the cases. If that offends you, I apologize, but it seems completely reasonable to me

 
At 7:05 PM, Blogger Keith, RN said...

Thank you for such a fabulous job, and I was honored to be included. I hope my (eventual) hosting of Grand Rounds is as classy and tremendously successful as your stellar effort!

 
At 7:52 PM, Blogger JohnG said...

Dr. Andy:

The prospect of being held accountable for my actions has never frightened me, nor has it dissuaded me from representing my clients. Truth is not something to be feared.

I'm all in favor of more transparency in the legal profession, especially as regards the merits of bringing suit against another individual. By all means, test us. Or consider the English system where the loser pays all costs, including attorneys' fees and damages suffered by the party wrongfully sued. Interesting, no?

Too bad I don't live in PA. But, it is probably not something that should be enacted by judicial fiat anyway. That great a change in society should come about by the legislative system through elected, and accountable, representatives.

Thanks for your reply. If I mis-stated my position I apologize. I was dismayed, not offended.

John

 
At 9:02 PM, Blogger Bob Coffield said...

Dr. Andy,
Great Job Dr. Andy! I'm glad that you used an enticing tag line to link to my Health Care Law Blog at the end of your edition of Grand Rounds. As I point out to most doctors I meet, I'm one of the good lawyers who defends doctors, hospitals and other health care providers against the plaintiff trial lawyers. As I often say, "I'm on the right side of the v. in Plaintiffs v. Doctors."

 
At 9:39 AM, Anonymous scan man said...

Hi Dr. Andy, I am radiologist in India. I came across Grand Rounds yesterday and was extremely impressed by your obvious organizational skills and insights. I would appreciate some help in accessing older versions of Grand Rounds.

 
At 10:07 AM, Blogger That Girl said...

Thanks for hosting! Great job on the format!

 
At 2:05 AM, Blogger JohnG said...

Dr. Andy and anyone else ruminating about the role of Trial Lawyers in the practice of Medicine:

Read an article published in the New York Sun on February 24, 2006. The reporter modifies the villan a bit by referring to them as Trial Lawyers, Inc. - an accurate description. See: http://www.nysun.com/article/28158

Good article and worth your time.

John

 
At 1:52 PM, Anonymous Jenni Prokopy said...

excellent job, Andy - i shared your info with my gals over at www.chronicbabe.com. :)

 
At 2:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Refer to Diabetes for
useful information

 
At 6:25 AM, Blogger Jonathan said...

When you are contemplating making a medical negligence claim you need to think about what constitutes a reasonable standard of care. In many cases this is whether a doctor's actions are recognised as being proper by a body of medical opinion. Whatever the definition, if a doctor is found to have provided an adequate standard of care, then there has been no medical negligence and no medical malpractice. Medical negligence is a serious issue and as a result you need to be able to demonstrate that the treatment received caused problems/illness to progress or begin. In some cases you may have to produce an expert witness whose job will be to present expert testimony that will establish the facts of your medical negligence case and give you more of a chance of being successful within it. For more details visit us at Medical negligence claims.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home